|
JURY CRITERIA The submitted designs are evaluated by expert and independent judges from design and related fields. Their knowledge and experience are the ultimate arbiters of the Spark Awards. The criteria below reflect some of the factors that they take into consideration (in no particular order). These criteria also pertain to the Student and Novice entries. May the most fabulous applications be nominated and win!
Inventiveness and innovation
Does the design "stretch the envelope" and enhance the human experience in a tangible new way?
(More below image) .jpg)
Poster courtesy Dan Sturges, Intrago. Logo by Kit Hinrichs, Studio Hinrichs
Sustainability
Everything in question and of importance in 21st century design: footprint, toxicity of manufacture or materials, land-fill afterlife, effect on atmospheric warming, recycled raw materials, energy consumption, educative value, et al—how environmentally sustainable is the design, from manufacture through packaging to use and final disposal? Elegance & beauty
Whether classic or modern, symmetrical or no, ah or aha! Does the design send you?
Functionality
How well does the design perform its function—and work? Is it efficient, economical—essential? Integration
Does the design fit the system? Does it mesh well and extend, achieving more than the concept alone? Durability
Is the design's lifespan appropriate to its usage and good sustainable practice? Implementation
What was the design strategy—how was progress measured—was the process itself innovative? Was the process multi-disciplinary? Did the design sell or fulfill its goals?
Safety and ergonomics
Is it safe and user-friendly? How well does the design suit a wide (and appropriate) range of users? Personal connection
Does the design help create feeling? Joy, delight, pleasure, inspiration or reverence? Aspiration
Does the design contribute in significant ways to overarching societal goals? Is it truly "design that makes a difference?"
|
